Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited to’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A phrase to the wise: make the most of the perks, the advice, and get the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you are a positive loser.
We submit to many generic outcomes: not just testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests in our selection of a beneficial, spiritual, safe place, or even to the denial of supernatural existence. Here,’chance’depends upon whether we are born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we could evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We only have to uncover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If one can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, one can wonder at the advantage or outcome in discipline assurances. A subject shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, and other unspecific language is no easy topic to decipher, nevertheless the dilemma is not impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to figure: first, we all know they’re computers programmed to come back a particular profit to the Casino; Areadomino second, we all know they need to have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the house; third, we all know some machines are set to pay for a smaller return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by way of a losing cycle. Learn to acknowledge the symptoms. Some players typically leave the Casino a winner. Allow you to ultimately quit a winner.
Back again to the other chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in your head;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one does not know the chronological schedule, he then is at the mercy of much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the likes of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, between the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “at hand” in the Last Age, and was visiting an in depth in A.D. 68.
Therefore, in view of these factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, in view of these conclusions, one still wants to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what pair of rules or inescapable facts will he select as a bonus in these greatly contested gambles? You cannot lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions now available and caused by fifteen years of arduous research.